home Equities V.GXU: Mutanga PEA pegs NPV at $112M (U.S.)

V.GXU: Mutanga PEA pegs NPV at $112M (U.S.)

GoviEx Uranium Inc. has completed a National Instrument 43-101 preliminary economic assessment (PEA) for the Mutanga uranium project in Zambia, which evaluates the economic and technical viability of a large-scale uranium project with low capital costs and low operating costs.

Highlights of the PEA include the following:

The Mutanga Project consists of three contiguous, fully-permitted mining licences.

The project development plan envisions an average annual production rate of 2.4 million pounds of U3O8 yellowcake over an initial 11-year mine life, with an 88% ultimate uranium recovery rate.

Initial capital costs are estimated at US$123 million, with estimated cash operating costs of US$31.1/lb U3O8, excluding royalties. Total life-of-mine (“LoM”) costs are forecast at US$37.9/lb U3O8.

The PEA is based on Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources of 15 million pounds (Mlb) U3O8 and 45 Mlb of Inferred Mineral Resources.

At a long-term uranium price of US$58/lb U3O8, the base case project economics for this project are positive, and indicate an after-tax net present value of US$112 million (at 8% discount rate) with an internal rate of return (IRR) of 25% and total life-of-mine net free cash of US$268 million.

Govind Friedland, GoviEx Executive Chairman, commented, “We are pleased by the encouraging results of this PEA. GoviEx now has two mine-permitted projects — Madaouela in Niger and Mutanga in Zambia — and we can clearly see the economic potential for both of these projects to be developed when uranium prices rise, as expected, as a result of the looming supply deficit forecast later this decade. Madaouela and Mutanga each have the potential to produce more than 2.4 million lbs U3O8 per annum steady state, with total life-of-mine costs less than US$38/lb U3O8 and no shortage of exploration potential to possibly expand the mineral resources.”

The PEA was prepared for GoviEx by SRK Consulting (UK) Limited (“SRK”) and the technical report, titled “NI 43-101 Technical Report on a Preliminary Economic Assessment of the Mutanga Uranium Project in Zambia”, will be filed on SEDAR at www.sedar.com and on the GoviEx website at www.goviex.com within 45 days.

The PEA is considered preliminary in nature and includes Inferred Mineral Resources that are considered too speculative geologically to have the economic considerations applied to them that would enable them to be categorized as Mineral Reserves. Mineral Resources that are not Mineral Reserves have not yet demonstrated economic viability. Due to the uncertainty that may be attached to Inferred Mineral Resources, it cannot be assumed that all or any part of an Inferred Mineral Resource will be upgraded to an Indicated or Measured Mineral Resource as a result of continued exploration or Mineral Reserves once economic considerations are applied; therefore, there is no certainty that the production profile concluded in the PEA will be realized.


The PEA evaluated the economic and technical viability of the Mutanga Project in the southern province of the Republic of Zambia, near the town of Siavonga. GoviEx holds several contiguous mining and prospecting licences acquired from Denison Mines Corp. and African Energy Resources Ltd. that are grouped as the Mutanga Project.


The Mutanga Project area is situated within the Karoo Supergroup, which is a thick, terrestrial sedimentary strata, widespread across much of southern Africa. The Karoo Supergroup consists of the three formations within the Lower Karoo and four formations within the Upper Karoo. There are at least six regional depositional sequences that broadly reflect synchronous episodes of basin subsidence and climate change. Many of the Karoo rift basins contain sandstone-hosted uranium mineral deposits; these deposits are more typically found within the Upper Karoo.

The geology at the Mutanga Project consists entirely of Escarpment Grit, ranging from thick, coarse conglomerate beds to thinly-bedded or cross-bedded fine- to medium-grained sandstones. Thin bands of shale and mudstone are intercalated in the sequence. Below the grits are well-developed calcareous shale and siltstone layers. Uranium mineralization occurs at the interface between siltstones and sandstones at redox boundaries.

Mineral Resources

The Mutanga Project contains a Measured and Indicated Mineral Resource of 21.6 million tonnes at an average grade of 318 ppm U3O8, containing 15 million pounds of U3O8, and an Inferred Mineral Resource of 74.6 million tonnes at an average grade of 273 ppm U3O8, containing 45 million pounds of U3O8 in six deposits located over a 65-kilometre strike. The mineral resource estimate was determined by SRK and was based on information provided in previous studies, shown in Table 1. The location of the deposits is shown in Figure 1.

Mineral Resource Estimate1, Mutanga Uranium Project, Zambia, 
SRK Consulting (UK) Ltd. — November 20, 2017

Deposit   Category Tonnes (Mt)U3O8 Grade (ppm)U3O8 Mlb
Mutanga2     Measured     1.9          481         2.0   
             Indicated    8.4          314         5.8   
             Inferred     7.2          206         3.3   
Dibwe2       Inferred    17.0          239         9.0   
Dibwe East2  Inferred    43.1          304         28.9  
Gwabe3       Measured     1.3          237         0.7   
             Indicated    3.6          313         2.5   
             Inferred     0.7          178         0.3   
Njame3       Measured     2.7          350         2.1   
             Indicated    3.7          252         2.1   
             Inferred     2.1          225         1.1   
Njame South3 Inferred     4.4          250         2.4   
Sub-total Measured        5.9          366         4.8   
Sub-total Indicated      15.7          299         10.4  
Measured and Indicated   21.6         317.5        15.1  
Inferred                 74.6         273.0        44.9  

1 Mineral Resources have not been constrained by pit shells; however, almost all of the mineralization occurs within 125 metres of surface with uranium grades which are, in general, considered to have reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction by open pit mining.2 The cut-off grade used for reporting the Mineral Resource is 100 ppm U3O8, which is applied directly to block model cells.3 No U3O8 ppm cut-off is applied to block model cells for reporting the Mineral Resource. However, the outer limits block model was constrained within a 100 ppm U3O8 wireframe used for geological modelling.

No Mineral Reserves have yet been determined for the Mutanga Project.


The deposits are amenable to conventional, shallow, open-cast mining methods, utilizing excavators and trucks with relatively low stripping ratios. The uranium oxide and waste are in cemented sandstone that will require blasting. Pit optimizations were run for considered deposits to determine pit limits and pushback development. Production schedules have been prepared for all deposits, assuming the same cut-off grade for each and a plant feed rate of 4.0 Mt per annum.

Using a uranium price of US$50/lb U3O8 for the pit optimization results in a Run-of-Mine (“RoM”) inventory that covers 11 years of production from the six considered deposits. Mining losses and dilution were applied as 10% and 10% global values. Diluting grade used was 0.0 ppm U3O8. The total pit inventory for mineralized material is 40.8 Mt at 333 ppm U3O8. The overall strip ratio for the project is 3.4, but varies from 1.4 to 6.0, depending on the deposit.


Two process options have been investigated: alkaline leach and acid leach. Acid heap leaching was selected on the basis that it gives slightly better overall recovery for all six deposits, while being more rapid and having lower operating and capital costs. The process is robust, simple, and has a low environmental profile. The uranium recovery and acid consumption from each deposit is shown in Table 2.

  Summary of Metallurgical Data

Deposit  Uranium Recovery (%)Acid Consumption (kg/t)

Mutanga           85.4                 3.86          
Dibwe East        93.3                 6.37          
Dibwe             74.6                 9.34          
Njame             83.1                 2.61          
Gwabe             69.7                 18.49         

Three separate uranium oxide preparation and leach areas will be developed adjacent to the deposits. The main facilities for recovery of uranium oxide will be located close to the Mutanga and Dibwe East pits. Separate satellite process facilities will be developed for the Dibwe and the Njame and Gwambe deposits.At each of the sorption plants, uranium will be stripped from the leach solution and loaded onto a resin. This process is reliable and has been proven at other locations. The barren leach solution will be returned to the barren pond to be used for leach solution make-up. Resin from all sorption plants will be directed to a central stripping plant located at Mutanga-Dibwe East, where uranium oxide will be precipitated after stripping the resin in the form of a dry powder that will be loaded directly into drums and immediately sealed. Per annum, uranium production is expected to average approximately 2.6 Mlbs U3O8, contained in uranium oxide at steady state.


GoviEx currently holds Zambia Environmental Management Agency (ZEMA) licences for the management, generating, and storing of hazardous waste, plus an emissions licence. Environmental Impact Assessments (EIA’s) were prepared for the Njame and Gwabe operations in 2008, and for the Mutanga and Dibwe operations in 2009. Environmental Management Plans (EMPs) were generated for both EIAs, and a Resettlement Action Plan (RAP) was also prepared for Mutanga. All licences required have been approved and are currently valid.

Transport and Logistics

Imported cargo will be sourced in South Africa or imported through Durban, South Africa, Walvis Bay, Namibia, and/or Dar-es-Salaam, Tanzania, then transported to site by road. Barrels of uranium oxide will be loaded into standard sea containers and trucked to the Walvis Bay sea port in Namibia.

Capital Costs

Forecast capital and operating expenditure for the life of the operation is presented in tables below. A two-year construction period ahead of production is envisaged. The operation is intended to be contractor-mined.

Capital ExpenditureParameter                  Units Total Amount               
Initial Project CapitalMine Mobilisation Fee(USDm)            0.4            
                       Plant                (USDm)           82.6            
                       Camp                 (USDm)            3.2            
                       Infrastructure       (USDm)            7.5            
                       G&A                  (USDm)            2.1            
                       EPCM                 (USDm)           12.0            
                       Contingency          (USDm)           10.7            
                       Community            (USDm)            5.0            
Total Initial Project Capital               (USDm)           123.4           
Total Deferred / Sustaining Capital         (USDm)           59.5            
Total Capital Expenditure                   (USDm)           182.9           

Life of Mine Operating Costs
Operating Cost Item     Total Amount (USDm)Unit Cost (USD/t ore)Unit Cost (USD/lb U3O8)
Mining                         452.5               11.1                  18.8          
Ore Transport                  20.4                 0.5                   0.9          
Processing                     288.9                7.1                  10.9          
G&A                            39.7                 1.0                   1.7          
Environmental                  18.0                 0.4                   0.7          
Subtotal Operating Costs       822.5               20.2                  31.1          

Project Economic Sensitivity

The study has produced the following economic results and sensitivity to uranium price.

Technical Economic Model Summary and Sensitivity to Uranium Price 
Parameter    (USD/lb U3O8)  Units  
Uranium Price                 50 58 70 
NPV 8%              (USDm)    37 112223
IRR                   (%)     15 25 38 
Net Free Cashflow   (USDm)    135269471
Payback Period      (Years)    7  3  2 

Qualified Persons

The qualified persons from SRK Consulting (UK) Limited for the July 2017 PEA are: Robert J. Bowell, B.Sc., PhD, C.Chem., CGeolFGS, EGeolFIMMM — Corporate Consultant (Recovery Methods, Mineral Processing and Metallurgical Testing) Martin Pittuck, C.Eng., FGS, MIMMM — Corporate Consultant (Exploration, geology, drilling, sample preparation, data verification and resource estimation) Guy Dishaw, P.Geo. — Senior Resource Geology Consultant (Exploration, geology, drilling, sample preparation, data verification and resource estimation)Filip Orzechowski, M.Sc., MIMMM, C.Eng. — Chartered Mining Engineer (Mining)

The scientific and technical information in this release has been reviewed and approved by Dr. Rob Bowell, a chartered chemist of the Royal Society of Chemistry, a chartered geologist of the Geological Society of London and Fellow of the Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Materials, who is an independent Qualified Person under the terms of NI 43-101 for uranium deposits. Mr. Bowell has verified the data disclosed in this news release.

About GoviEx Uranium

GoviEx is a mineral resource company focused on the exploration and development of uranium properties in Africa. GoviEx’s principal objective is to become a significant uranium producer through the continued exploration and development of its flagship mine-permitted Madaouela Project in Niger, its Mutanga Project in Zambia, and its other uranium properties in Africa.

Source: Stockwatch

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *